Skip to content

874

of 901 checked against a source

Percussion and pro-audio retailer · 901 products

874 of 901 products checked against a named source, and the other 27 listed by name

A percussion and pro-audio retailer’s catalogue of 901 products. We checked 874 against a named source and listed the other 27 as unchecked instead of guessing. Because the report says what we could not verify, the number at the top of it is worth reading.

What arrived

A catalogue of 901 products from a percussion and pro-audio retailer. For each product, the job was to compare what the supplier’s file said with a named source and report what agreed, what differed and what was missing.

What we found

We found a named source for 874 of the 901 products. The source’s own search did not index the other 27 at all, so there was nothing to check them against.

What we did

We checked the 874. The other 27 are listed by name at the top of the report as unchecked, and we did not guess at them or quietly leave them out.

The report said so in its first lines, before any finding:

LineWhat the report said
ProductsEvaluated 874 of 901 products. 27 had no usable source, with the list
AttributesEvaluated 31 of 54 attributes. 23 have no external authority, with the list
Evidence2,612 source rows, read between 2 and 19 August 2026, up to 24 days old
These are the first three lines of the report we handed over, in its own words. It is just as open about the attributes: 23 of the 54 had no outside source to check them against, and the report said which.

What came back

The first line of this report says what it could not check. 874 is smaller than 901, but it is the more useful number, because every finding below it rests on products that were actually checked against something.

How we counted

From the delivered report’s own header. A product counts as checked when it resolved to a confirmed page for that product. The 27 are the products the source’s search did not index.

What it means for your file

Ask anyone who checks or fills your product data, us included, for the number they could not check. A figure with no exceptions listed leaves you to guess which values were checked and which were assumed.

The product data quality checklist lists the checks to run on a catalogue before it goes live.

See it work onyour own data

Nothing goes live without your sign-offEvery value keeps its sourceYour data is never shared

The quickest way to judge RefynData is on your own catalogue: your file, your categories, cleaned in front of you.

One email to set a time. No mailing list, no follow-up sequence.